MatchFormula Trouver un match
Menu
UTC+8
Fuseau horaireAsia/Shanghai
Français
AUS Australie - New South Wales NPL - Femmes · Match ·

Apia L Tigers (F) vs Gladesville Ravens (F)

Full model forecast,stats and analysis

Domicile form
Projected score3–13.77 expected goals
Extérieur form
Victoire à domicile68%
Nul16%
Victoire à l’extérieur15%
Full model forecastVictoire à domicileTier A · 68% selection probability
Full model forecast · Tier A

Match prediction

Model and market agree on HOME Compare the forecast, reference prices, form and key match signals below.

Primary callVictoire à domicile68% selection probability
Projected score3–1Apia L Tigers (F)Gladesville Ravens (F)
Expected goals3.77Ouverture match profile
Goals 2.5Plus de73% for the selected side
Les deux équipes marquentOui62% for the selected side
Expected corners9.0Moins de 9.5
Market dashboard

Every available prediction

Each row shows the selection and probability for that market. Correct-score and corner projections do not include standalone probabilities.

MarketSélectionProbabilitéCote juste
68% / 16% / 15%Résultat du matchVictoire à domicile68%1.47
Derived from 1X2 · excludes Gladesville Ravens (F) win (15.5%)Double chance1X84.5%1.18
Plus de 73% · Moins de 27%Goals 2.5Plus de73%1.37
Oui 62% · Non 38%Les deux équipes marquentOui62%1.61
3.77 total expected goalsScore exact3–1
9.0 expected match cornersCornersMoins de 9.5
Price comparison

Published forecast vs reference market

Reference odds are converted to normalized probabilities. The gap is descriptive and is not a claim of guaranteed value.

Displayed margin10.8%Largest probability gapGladesville Ravens (F) winDifference-0.7 pp
OutcomePronosticCote justeReference oddsNormalized marketDifference
Apia L Tigers (F) win68%1.471.3367.9%+0.1 pp
Nul16%6.255.5016.4%-0.4 pp
Gladesville Ravens (F) win15%6.675.7515.7%-0.7 pp

Reference odds are the pre-match prices stored with this forecast; later market movements do not change the original review.

Scoring projection

Expected-goals split

Expected goals show how the projected scoring total is divided between the two teams.

Apia L Tigers (F)2.68

Domicile share of expected goals 71.1%

Total expected goals3.77Ouverture

Dedicated goals model: Plus de 73% · Moins de 27%

Gladesville Ravens (F)1.09

Extérieur share of expected goals 28.9%

Projected score3–1BTTS splitOui 62% · Non 38%Match profileOuverture
Recent form

Five-result form summary

The five displayed results are summarized into wins, draws, losses and points for a quick comparison.

Domicile-context · form sequence

Apia L Tigers (F)

1.60pts / match
Joués5Wins2Drawn2Losses1Points8

SignalDomicile unbeaten 4/5

Extérieur-context · form sequence

Gladesville Ravens (F)

0.60pts / match
Joués5Wins0Drawn3Losses2Points3

SignalDomicile matches over 2.5: 4/5

Side-by-side

Matchup comparison

Current match outlook
68%
Gagné probability excluding draw
15%
8
Points from supplied form
3
2.68
Expected goals
1.09
Apia L Tigers (F)Gladesville Ravens (F)
Signals and risk

What supports — and challenges — the call

Signals are kept separate from derived risk checks so the page never turns one trend into certainty.

Match signal

Model and market agree on HOME

This is the main matchup observation to consider alongside the probabilities and recent form.

01Apia L Tigers (F) signalDomicile unbeaten 4/5

This trend belongs to the home team and should be read alongside the probability table.

02Gladesville Ravens (F) signalDomicile matches over 2.5: 4/5

This trend belongs to the away team and does not override the independent market probabilities.

!Primary-call risk32% outside the selected call

The selected outcome can still fail. Nul probability alone is 16%.

Match questions

Apia L Tigers (F) vs Gladesville Ravens (F) FAQ

What is the current prediction?

Current prediction: Victoire à domicile · Projected score 3–1 · 68% selection probability.

What are the 1X2 probabilities?

Apia L Tigers (F) victoire 68%,Nul 16%,Gladesville Ravens (F) victoire 15%。

Is this expected to be a high-scoring match?

Total expected goals 3.77 · Plus de 2.5 73% · Current selection Plus de