MatchFormula Găsește un meci
Menu
UTC+8
Fus orarAsia/Shanghai
Română
INT Australia - NSW - League 1 U20 · Meci ·

Hills United FC U20 vs Canterbury Bankstown FC U20

Full model forecast,stats and analysis

Gazde form
Projected score3–14.34 expected goals
Oaspeți form
Victorie gazde71%
Egal16%
Victorie oaspeți13%
Full model forecastVictorie gazdeTier A · 71% selection probability
Full model forecast · Tier A

Match prediction

Model and market agree on HOME Compare the forecast, reference prices, form and key match signals below.

Primary callVictorie gazde71% selection probability
Projected score3–1Hills United FC U20Canterbury Bankstown FC U20
Expected goals4.34Deschide match profile
Goals 2.5Peste81% for the selected side
Ambele echipe marcheazăDa57% for the selected side
Expected corners9.5Sub 9.5
Market dashboard

Every available prediction

Each row shows the selection and probability for that market. Correct-score and corner projections do not include standalone probabilities.

MarketSelecțieProbabilitateCotă corectă
71% / 16% / 13%Rezultatul meciuluiVictorie gazde71%1.41
Derived from 1X2 · excludes Canterbury Bankstown FC U20 win (13.3%)Șansă dublă1X86.7%1.15
Peste 81% · Sub 19%Goals 2.5Peste81%1.23
Da 57% · Nu 43%Ambele echipe marcheazăDa57%1.75
4.34 total expected goalsScor corect3–1
9.5 expected match cornersCornereSub 9.5
Price comparison

Published forecast vs reference market

Reference odds are converted to normalized probabilities. The gap is descriptive and is not a claim of guaranteed value.

Displayed margin11.7%Largest probability gapHills United FC U20 winDifference+1.6 pp
OutcomePredicțieCotă corectăReference oddsNormalized marketDifference
Hills United FC U20 win71%1.411.2969.4%+1.6 pp
Egal16%6.255.5016.3%-0.3 pp
Canterbury Bankstown FC U20 win13%7.696.2514.3%-1.3 pp

Reference odds are the pre-match prices stored with this forecast; later market movements do not change the original review.

Scoring projection

Expected-goals split

Expected goals show how the projected scoring total is divided between the two teams.

Hills United FC U203.46

Gazde share of expected goals 79.7%

Total expected goals4.34Deschide

Dedicated goals model: Peste 81% · Sub 19%

Canterbury Bankstown FC U200.88

Oaspeți share of expected goals 20.3%

Projected score3–1BTTS splitDa 57% · Nu 43%Match profileDeschide
Recent form

Five-result form summary

The five displayed results are summarized into wins, draws, losses and points for a quick comparison.

Gazde-context · form sequence

Hills United FC U20

1.40pts / match
Jucate5Wins2Drawn1Losses2Puncte7

SignalGazde clean sheets: 2/5

Oaspeți-context · form sequence

Canterbury Bankstown FC U20

0.00pts / match
Jucate5Wins0Drawn0Losses5Puncte0

SignalOaspeți matches over 2.5: 4/5

Side-by-side

Matchup comparison

Current match outlook
71%
Câștig probability excluding draw
13%
7
Points from supplied form
0
3.46
Expected goals
0.88
Hills United FC U20Canterbury Bankstown FC U20
Signals and risk

What supports — and challenges — the call

Signals are kept separate from derived risk checks so the page never turns one trend into certainty.

Match signal

Model and market agree on HOME

This is the main matchup observation to consider alongside the probabilities and recent form.

01Hills United FC U20 signalGazde clean sheets: 2/5

This trend belongs to the home team and should be read alongside the probability table.

02Canterbury Bankstown FC U20 signalOaspeți matches over 2.5: 4/5

This trend belongs to the away team and does not override the independent market probabilities.

!Primary-call risk29% outside the selected call

The selected outcome can still fail. Egal probability alone is 16%.

Match questions

Hills United FC U20 vs Canterbury Bankstown FC U20 FAQ

What is the current prediction?

Current prediction: Victorie gazde · Projected score 3–1 · 71% selection probability.

What are the 1X2 probabilities?

Hills United FC U20 câștig 71%,Egal 16%,Canterbury Bankstown FC U20 câștig 13%。

Is this expected to be a high-scoring match?

Total expected goals 4.34 · Peste 2.5 81% · Current selection Peste